Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-5279400-20160414195340/@comment-30384903-20160415202445

Well, people have been trying to tell you in the comment area of Darkborn, that NO, in canon, the term "Lightborn", as of the most recent full-length book, Dangerous Deception, DOES NOT EXIST, in the matter of it had not been confirmed to exist.

Personally I don't waste my time thinking about whether it exists or not; if or when canon tells me it does, then I'll know; there's really no point of wondering about issues that can only be answered if or when the authors choose to do so. You are of course free to think and ask about it, but just don't force the speculations into actual articles like what happened before. Perhaps they do actually exist, and when it is confirmed you can throw it in our faces and tell us "I told you so", but at the moment it is just fan theory and nothing more.

As for the below comment, Andrewh7 wrote: I mean Darkborns exist, so why not Lightborns? Well, let me ask you this: Is there something called "Light Fire" in canon? I never hide the fact that I'm not exactly familiar with the series, so there could be this thing and I missed it. My point is that, so far in canon, it stated Darkborns got the names because they were born after the Dark Fire, so, if you are so keen to believe a species called Lightborns, you should really be asking yourself if a Light Fire exists so they could be born. I don't see the point of debating to begin with since my belief is sticking to canon content, but at least try to make your argument sound. How Darkborns came to be was very specific, you shouldn't just automatically assume just because there's a "Dark" in its name there'd be a "Light" counterpart. I suppose with the series engraving the concept of Dark and Light Casters, it's easier to think like that, but from what I gathered, the rules have changed and imo, the authors haven't really gotten around to fully explain the situation. That's my take for now.